The Enduring Myths of the 1950s People Should Unlearn
The Enduring Myths of the 1950s People Should Unlearn

The Enduring Myths of the 1950s People Should Unlearn

Larry Holzwarth - December 10, 2021

The Enduring Myths of the 1950s People Should Unlearn
Levittown, Pennsylvania, one of several sprawling suburbs created largely by the GI Bill. Wikimedia

18. The GI Bill of Rights extended to all American Veterans in the 1950s

By 1956, when the original Servicemen’s Readjustment Act, popularly known as the GI Bill of Rights, expired nearly 8 million Americans had availed themselves of some, if not all, of the education benefits available to them. Education benefits were paid out to almost 50% of the eligible veterans. Millions more took advantage of the zero down payment home mortgage programs, which offered more favorable terms for new construction, creating a building boom for the construction industry. The GI Bill was in essence an extraordinarily large stimulus package benefiting veterans, their families, industry, and higher education. But it was not administered fairly across the board. Out of 67,000 mortgages under the GI Bill in New York and New Jersey in the early 1950s, fewer than 100 were taken out by Black veterans. They simply couldn’t find builders who would sell to them.

Black veterans also found discrimination when applying to colleges and universities, often applying for benefits only to be denied enrollment in the institution. In the South, applicants for benefits for both mortgages and education discovered the bill had been written to accommodate the Jim Crow laws of the South, and segregation prevented many Black veterans from participation. Not until the Civil Rights Movement of the late 1950s and the 1960s were southern institutions of higher learning compelled to accept qualified Black students. In the 1950s, the doctrine of “separate but equal” prevailed, and the rights of almost 80% of Black veterans were denied by the prevailing racist policies. Technically, nothing prevented them from applying for their benefits. Being able to use them was another matter entirely. It was one of the many sad truths of the 1950s, buried in the myths of that decade being one of a better America.

The Enduring Myths of the 1950s People Should Unlearn
Ads promising increased attraction from the opposite sex were as common in the 1950s as in later decades. Wikimedia

19. Teenage pregnancies in the 1950s were rare, because of chastity

The 1950s are often viewed as a time when teenagers were chaste, and giving birth out of wedlock was rare. It is a myth. Teenage birth rates soared throughout the 1950s. The birth rate for teenage girls age 15-19 in 2001 was less than half what it had been in 1957. The rate increased beginning in 1950, when just over 80 births per thousand occurred. In 1957 it reached 96.3, then slowly decreased but ended the decade still well into the 80s. In the 1950s the rate remained high across all ethnicities, though it was slightly higher among the Black community than the White. If the 1950s were the often remembered “good old days”, then the argument that teenage chastity was one reason for it is obviously erroneous. Sexual education in the schools was not presented in the 1950s, became controversial in the 1960s, and remains controversial today.

As with nearly all other aspects of American life, television ignored these facts completely during the 1950s. Yet television made the teenager a target for marketers, particularly girls. Fashion, makeup, hairstyles, and behavior were all presented with an eye on teenagers, a growing market with disposable income. In addition, teenagers saw the advertisements aimed for adults and the good life they presented, with cigarettes, beer, cocktail parties, entertaining guests, and found themselves compelled to act like the adults in the ads. Even while Lucille Ball was pregnant, both she and Desi advertised cigarettes during their show, and in print advertisements in magazines. The 1950s were a time of flickering images of an America which existed only on television, which ignored the real America outside of the emerging white suburbs.

The Enduring Myths of the 1950s People Should Unlearn
Ozzie, Harriet, David, and Ricky Nelson, stars of The Adventures of Ozzie and Harriet. ABC

20. Television shaped America’s remembrance of the 1950s

During the decade itself and in the years since, television created the enduring image of the 1950s. There were four networks in the 1950s, CBS, NBC, ABC, and at the beginning of the decade, DuMont. The latter ceased operation in 1956. On all networks, the evening news programs were short, just fifteen minutes in the beginning. The entertainment divisions were nearly indiscernible from one another. All featured variety programs, situation comedies, and dramatic programs. Those which were set contemporaneously presented a society which excluded the ethnic communities, other than presenting them in a negative manner, such as the perpetrators of crimes, or as the victims. Sitcoms were about White families, with a father working, a mother working as a housewife, and two or three well-behaved, socially successful children. Crises centered around school, or sports, or other problems of suburban life.

The distorted view of the 1950s presented during the decade, which has endured to the present day, excluded large sections of American society. It ignored the social problems of the day, racial tensions, difficulties encountered by veterans re-entering civilian life, an unequal economy, and for the most part, the expanding Cold War. Instead, it presented an America which existed only in a small part of society, and even then, not in the manner imagined by the writers. Few mothers made the beds and cleaned house while wearing pearls. They existed solely on television, where they still can be found on television channels dedicated to nostalgia. The ensuing decades took a more incisive look at American life, even in programs meant solely to entertain. Even so, to many the 1950s remains a time when America was a better place than it is today.

Where do we find this stuff? Here are our sources:

“Sputnik: The Space Race’s Opening Shot”. Elizabeth Howell, Space.com. September 29, 2020

“Dwight D. Eisenhower and the birth of the Interstate Highway System”. Lee Lacy, US Army. February 20, 2018. Online

“Business failure rates 1946 – 1964”. Graph, US Department of Commerce. Online

“Montgomery Bus Boycott”. Article, Martin Luther King Institute, Stanford University. Online

“1950-1959 Ballpark Attendance”. Chart, Ballparks of Baseball. Online

“The Pledge of Allegiance”. Article, US History.org. Online

“The Checkers Speech After 60 Years”. Lee Huebner, The Atlantic. September 22, 2012. Online

“Curing Juvenile Delinquency in the 1950s”. John Passaniti, The Great Nuclear Society. February 16, 2013. Online

“All the Violent Shows on TV in Chicago, One Day in 1954”. Rebecca Onion, Slate. January 27, 2014

“The Endless Holiday”. Bruce Hardy, Vanity Fair. October, 2014

“How The CIA Overthrew Iran’s Democracy In 4 Days”. Lawrence Wu, Michell Lanz, National Public Radio. Online

“The Card That Started It All”. Neil Steinberg, Chicago Sun-Times. March 13, 2000

“Forging the Shield. The US Army in Europe, 1951-1962”. Donald A. Carter, Center of Military History, US Army. Online

“The Girls Who Paved the Way”. Gabrielle Levy, US News and World Report. June 1, 2018

“Beat movement”. Article, Britannica.com. Online

“Uncovering the History of the Hula Hoop”. Cie McCullough Buschle, Wired. November 1, 2018. Online

“The controversial history of Levittown, America’s first suburb”. Noah Sheidlower, Untapped New York. Online

“How the GI Bill’s Promise Was Denied to a Million Black WWII Veterans”. Erin Blakemore, History.com. June 21, 2019

“Births to teenagers in the United States, 1940-2000”. Report, Centers for Disease Control (CDC). September 25, 2001. Online

“The Impact of Television in 1950s America”. Steve Wiegand, Dummies.com. Online

Advertisement