1. A Travesty of Justice That Led to Law Changes

Steven Steinberg’s insanity was only temporary: he was sane at the time of the acquittal. So the defendant walked out of court a free man. In the trial’s aftermath, Arizona changed its insanity defense laws. Judges were thenceforth required to impose a “guilty but insane” sentence in temporary insanity scenarios such as that of the Steinberg case. Criminal defendants who are found guilty but insane nowadays would have to go to a mental institute. There, they might be interred for as long as if they had been sentenced to prison.
_________________
Where Did We Find This Stuff? Some Sources and Further Reading
Frondorf, Shirley – Death of a Jewish American Princess: The True Story of a Victim on Trial (1988)
History Collection – Vigilante Justice and the Small Town Bully: A Crime That Shocked America
Knappman, Edward W., et al. – Great American Trials (1994)
Law Buzz – Sleepwalking: A Defense to Murder First Used in 1846
Look and Learn – Chief Inspector Ledru, the Policeman Who Caught … Himself
Madera Tribune, December 20th, 1950 – Sleepwalker Freed on Murder Charge by Australia Jury
New York Times, October 9th, 1988 – The Defense Pleaded Nagging
Smithsonian Magazine, April 30th, 2012 – The Case of the Sleepwalking Killer



