Back to the front page
General

20 Facts About the Tragic Life of Charles I

Anthony van Dyck - Charles I with M. de St Antoine

The Petition of Right, a document that proved a thorn in Charles’s side, London, 1628. Beaufort County Now

10. In 1628, Parliament passed the Petition of Right, limiting the king’s power and increasing their own. Charles decided to ignore it.

Relations between Charles and Parliament were already fraught by the time he imposed the ‘forced loans’ in 1627. In sum, Charles’s handling of royal spending, religious matters, and continued fostering of Buckingham already meant that Parliament was a noisy place to spend an afternoon if you were the king in the 1620s. But the ‘forced loans’ were the final straw. In direct response, a group of MPs drew up the Petition of Right in 1628. This document prevented the king from imprisoning people without trial, raising taxes without permission, and imposing his royal prerogative in Parliament.

How did Charles respond? Well, he nominally agreed to it, as it was a lot easier to get Parliament to raise money for the wars, albeit with the immortal words: ‘kings are not bound to give account of their actions but to God alone’. Parliament was delighted, but nonetheless Charles did not stick to his word. In his mind, he was deciding between the will of the people and God, whose lieutenant he was. Thus, within a few weeks he re-asserted his right to raise taxes as it pleased him. These actions would come back to haunt him.

Written by

I am a freelance historical and literary writer based in West Yorkshire, UK. I read for a funded PhD in English at the University of Oxford (Magdalen College) and graduated in 2016. I am a former lecturer in Medieval English Literature at Royal Holloway, University of London. My publications include peer-reviewed articles in academic publications, and pieces in mainstream magazines such as History Today and Fortean Times. For more information, please see www.drflight.co.uk

Keep reading

Advertisement