4. Minimalist vs Maximalist Views

Biblical scholarship today is divided into minimalist and maximalist camps when it comes to the Exodus account’s historicity. Maximalist scholars give the biblical text a presumption of historical reliability, unless contradicted by external evidence. Some argue for a late thirteenth century BC Exodus in the reign of Pharaoh Ramesses II. They argue that although there is no evidence that supports Exodus, future discoveries may yet confirm that it had actually happened.
Minimalist scholars treat the Bible primarily as literature and cultural expression, and require independent corroboration for historical claims. They argue that the Exodus is largely a literary construct, with little or no basis in historical events. They point to the lack of external corroboration, and anachronisms in the text. A middle position is also popular: that while the biblical story is not literally true, it is not wholly invented. Rather, it probably blends history, myth, and memory.



