12 Military Deceptions that Changed the Course of History Forever

12 Military Deceptions that Changed the Course of History Forever

Khalid Elhassan - November 19, 2017

Military deception is the art of misleading an enemy during wartime, via information warfare and disinformation, psychological operations, manipulating and amplifying the fog of war in which the opponent operates, visual deceptions, or similar methodologies intended to get the foe to act based on wrong intelligence. This causes the enemy to do what he should not, refrain from doing what he should, and otherwise operate at a disadvantage in a way that could be exploited by the side pulling off the deception.

War leaders from the dawn of recorded history, from Ancient Sumer in the third millennium BC and earlier, and up to our modern era, have benefited from such deceptions. Sun Tzu’s The Art of War prioritizes deception, placing it high on the list of arts a commander should master. Be it via unpredictable conduct, confusing maneuvers, denial of information, misinformation, disinformation, getting inside the opposing commander’s head and messing with his psyche, camouflage, concealment, or the use of dummies and decoys, the ability to deceive and bamboozle an enemy has often proven the difference between winning and losing, and the resultant binary of life or death.

12 Military Deceptions that Changed the Course of History Forever
Dummy vehicles and fake water filling station in North Africa during WW2. Wikiwand

Following are twelve of the most interesting military deceptions in history, where success or failure often depended upon the ability to mislead the enemy.

12 Military Deceptions that Changed the Course of History Forever
Egyptian soldiers celebrating successful crossing of the Suez Canal on first day of the Yom Kippur War. Reddit

Lead-up to the 1973 Yom Kippur War

The first is the run-up to the surprise attack against Israeli positions in the Sinai Peninsula. This deception kicked off the 1973 Yom Kippur War between Israel and a coalition of Egypt and Syria, supported by expeditionary forces from other Arab states. The Egyptians resorted to deception measures which succeeded in fooling the Israelis about the timing of the attack, and caught them off guard when the blow fell in the Sinai.

Israel had seized Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula in the 1967 Six Day War, and over the subsequent years, a virtual standoff ensued. Egyptian and Israeli forces glared at each other across the narrow Suez Canal, which separated the rivals and across which low intensity warfare simmered for years- comprised in the main of artillery exchanges, commando raids, and aerial attacks. Meanwhile, Egypt – who was seeking to regain its lost territory and to wipe out the humiliation of the 1967 defeat – rebuilt, reorganized, and retrained its military for a rematch that all involved expected was coming.

Far in advance of the attack, Egyptian president Anwar Sadat began running massive military maneuvers in the vicinity of the Suez Canal, with the aim of accustoming the Israelis to large scale Egyptian troop movements near the Sinai, so when the time came for the actual attack, they would be lulled into dismissing its preparations as just another drill.

Unbeknownst to the Egyptians, the Israelis – through a highly placed Mossad agent – were aware by mid-1973 of the general Egyptian plan of attack. What the Israelis did not know, however, was when the attack would occur. Knowing the when was vital for Israel, whose small population precluded a large permanent military establishment – they could not afford to park hundreds of thousands of soldiers indefinitely in fortifications opposite the Egyptian positions. Instead, the Israeli system was predicated upon fleshing out a small standing military with a rapid and massive mobilization of civilian reservists. However, such mobilizations were highly disruptive, as well as quite expensive, and the mass of civilians taken from their daily occupations and put into the military could not be kept in uniform for long.

Playing upon that vulnerability, months before the planned attack, the Egyptians tricked the Israelis into believing that an attack was imminent, causing them to declare a disruptive and expensive emergency mobilization. Burned once by that false alarm, the Israelis were reluctant to call another mobilization a few months later, when the Egyptians began preparations for the real attack.

A week before the attack, the Egyptians conducted massive military maneuvers near the Suez Canal, during which they called up reservists, but Israeli intelligence dismissed it as just another drill. To further lull their enemy, two days before the actual attack, the Egyptians announced the demobilization of the reservists called up for the “military exercise”.

Some dissenting voices within Israeli intelligence sounded the alarm that these were preparations for actual war, but they were ignored. Thus, when the Egyptians launched their attack across the Suez Canal on October 6th, 1973, Israel was caught completely off guard and wrong footed, and suffered high casualties as its forward fortifications were swiftly overrun, and the Egyptians secured a beachhead on the eastern side of the canal. Although the Israelis eventually prevailed in the war, clawing their way back up and encircling an Egyptian army weeks later, their early setbacks and high casualties early in the war were a direct result of the successful Egyptian deception operation.

12 Military Deceptions that Changed the Course of History Forever
Inflatable dummy truck used during the D-Day deceptions. Warfare History Network

D-Day Landing Deceptions

In the run up to the D-Day landings in Normandy, the Western Allies devised a multifaceted plan to deceive the Germans about the timing and location of their planned invasion of Europe in 1944. The deception aimed to conceal the actual time and date of the invasion, convince the Germans that the main invasion would land in the Pas de Calais, and keep the Germans from shifting troops from the Pas de Calais to Normandy. They wanted to achieve this by convincing them that the Normandy landings were diversionary, intended to draw defenders from the Pas de Calais in order to weaken it for the main invasion.

A major component of the deception was Operation Fortitude South, which created a fictitious “First US Army Group” (FUSAG) in southeast England opposite the Pas de Calais, under the command of general George S. Patton. Allied intelligence sold the fake army group’s existence to the Germans with fake radio traffic between fictitious FUSAG units. The process was successful by allowing German air reconnaissance to fly over and photograph concentrations of FUSAG tanks and transports that were actually inflatable dummies, and feeding German intelligence fake reports via double agents and turned spies about FUSAG’s intentions to invade the Pas de Calais. A subsidiary, Fortitude North, created a fictitious British Fourth Army in Scotland, and convinced the Germans that it planned to invade Norway so as to tie down the German divisions there.

After D-Day, the Allied deception plan successfully kept the Germans from committing fully to a counter attack by convincing them that the Normandy landings were not the main event, but the first in a series of landings. The German high command was thus led to keep units guarding other potential landing sites, mainly the Pas de Calais which was threatened by the fictitious FUSAG under Patton, instead of sending them to reinforce the Normandy defenders.

The deception succeeded beyond the Allies’ wildest expectations. Intelligence planners had hoped to convince the Germans to stay put in the Pas de Calais for two weeks after D-Day, rather than immediately send the units there to reinforce Normandy. Instead, the deception worked so well that the Germans stayed put in the Pas de Calais not just for the hoped-for two weeks, but for seven. The breathing space bought the Allies time to strengthen their Normandy beachhead to not only withstand German counterattacks, but to break out of Normandy in July and rapidly sweep through France, whose liberation was largely completed by September, with rampaging Allied armies that finally halted at the German border after running out of fuel.

12 Military Deceptions that Changed the Course of History Forever
Operation Uranus. Quora

Operation Uranus

In 1942, the Germans launched a great summer offensive in the southern USSR, whose Army Group A was tasked with capturing the vital Soviet oilfields in the Caucasus. To shield that advance into the Caucasus from Soviet armies attacking their rear with an advance southward across the Steppe and down the Volga river, the German Sixth Army, accompanied by armies from other Axis countries, was tasked with sealing off the Steppe to the north by setting up a defensive line along the narrowest stretch of Steppe, between the great bends of the Don and Volga rivers where they bulged towards each other. At the easternmost terminus of that line, on the Volga river – an important transportation artery, linking southern Russia and the Caucasus with the north – was to be interdicted at the city of Stalingrad.

The northern advance to the Volga was thus a supporting operation, whose purpose was to simply protect the rear of the German armies advancing on the Caucasus. However, when that northern advance reached Stalingrad and fought to capture that city, the symbolism of its being named after Stalin transformed the battle for its capture from a mere means to an end, and into an end in of itself, as Hitler grew increasingly fixated on seizing the city.

By late 1942, as the Germans fought desperately to wrest Stalingrad from the Soviets, who fought even more desperately to maintain a toehold in the city, the Soviet high command developed plans for an ambitious strategic counteroffensive to take advantage of the Germans’ increasing tunnel vision regarding Stalingrad, and use it to turn the tables on them. To that end, they implemented a deception plan leading up to the first step of their counteroffensive, Operation Uranus, November 19 – 23, 1942.

The German defeat came because they thought small, while their enemy thought big: the Germans thought that they were in a fight for Stalingrad as an end in of itself, while the Soviets saw the fight for Stalingrad it as but a means to a greater end. The Soviets’ ambitious counteroffensive depended upon the Germans remaining fixated on the fighting inside Stalingrad, and so played them like carnival hucksters preying on the greed of gullible marks, by carefully trickling in just enough reinforcements across the Volga to the outnumbered defenders inside the city to keep the fight going. The Germans, looking only at Stalingrad, expected that victory inside the city was within reach – at their high water mark, they occupied nearly 90% of the city, reached the Volga on multiple stretches, and split the shrinking pocket of defenders in two. All they needed was just a few more troops, and the city was theirs.

In the meantime, the Soviets quietly massed attack formations north and south of Stalingrad, facing Romanian, Hungarian, and Italian armies guarding the flanks of the Germans inside Stalingrad. On November 19th, 1942, the Soviets launched Operation Uranus with pincer attacks against the lower quality armies of Germany’s Axis partners north and south of Stalingrad, quickly smashed through and routed them, and within four days, the Soviet pincers met about 50 miles west of Stalingrad, completing a double envelopment that trapped the German Sixth Army inside that city. Desperate German efforts to reach the trapped army failed, and efforts to supply it by air fell short. Within two months, the last surviving Germans inside Stalingrad, cold, starving, and nearly out of ammunition, were forced to surrender in the first catastrophic German defeat of the war.

12 Military Deceptions that Changed the Course of History Forever
Q-ship, with guns covered, and revealed. Joanne’s Ramblings


During WWI, as part of the effort to beat back the German U-boat menace, the British Royal Navy made use of special decoy vessels known as Q-ships, which were heavily armed merchant ships carrying concealed weapons. Intended as bait to lure enemy submarines, the seemingly unarmed Q-ships would unveil their guns and sink the U-boats once they emerged to make a surface attack.

During the war’s first years, before Germany declared unrestricted submarine warfare in 1917 and began sinking ships at sight and without warning, the standard operating procedure was for U-boats to hail a civilian vessels, allowing their crews an opportunity to take to their lifeboats, before opening fire and sinking the ship with a torpedo, or more often, with shells from the U-boat’s deck gun when practicable, in order to save the more expensive torpedoes for tougher targets.

The Q-ship decoys were usually trawlers or freighters carrying hidden guns in collapsible deck structures. They would sail routes known to be heavily infested with U-boats, in the hopes of attracting the attention of a German submarine and enticing it to make an attack. When hailed by the U-boat, a portion of the crew, known as the “panic party”, would act like normal merchant sailors, terrified by the sudden appearance of an enemy submarine, and rush to the lifeboats to abandon ship.

Since the use of expensive and powerful torpedoes to sink relatively easy targets such as trawlers and freighters would be overkill, and was also officially frowned upon, the U-boat’s captain would normally close the distance to the now “abandoned” ship, in order to open fire from close range and sink it with the deck gun. Once the submarine got close enough, hidden crewmen remaining on board the Q-board would haul down the merchant flag and raise the Royal Navy’s ensign, while other crew would collapse the deck structure, revealing up to four guns manned and ready for action, which would open fire and sink the surprised U-boat.

The decoy vessels were quite successful when first introduced, and within months, Q-ships claimed 11 German submarines. However, as the war progressed, German submariners learned to be wary, and to approach small vessels with a healthy dose of caution, lest they turn out to be Q-ships carrying concealed weapons. At the slightest suspicion, torpedoes were used as a first option to sink vessels from a safe distance. After the Germans turned to open submarine warfare in 1917 and began sinking ships without warning, the utility of the Q-ships came to an end, as their effectiveness had depended on U-boats hailing and coming close enough for the decoy ship to surprise them, and once the Germans abandoned that standard operating procedure, Q-ships became useless.

12 Military Deceptions that Changed the Course of History Forever
USS Indianola. NavSource

Destruction of the USS Indianola

The USS Indianola was a Union ironclad river gunboat that served in the Western Theater during the American Civil War with the US Navy’s Mississippi Squadron, operating in the Mississippi and Yazoo rivers. She ran past Confederate batteries in Vicksburg to reach the Red River and help block Confederate supplies from sailing down its waters, but once she got there she was set upon by Confederate rams on the night of February 24th, 1863, ran aground, and was captured.

The Indianola’s capture derailed the plans to blockade the Red River, and its presence in Confederate hands was too great a threat to Union operations in the region to be endured. Plans were thus made to recapture the ironclad or destroy it so as to deprive the enemy of its use, setting in motion one of the war’s most successful deception operations and hoaxes.

Union naval commander David Porter ordered the construction of a dummy ironclad out of an old coal barge that was made to resemble a real warship, with paddle boxes, fake gun emplacements out of which stuck “cannons” that were actually wooden logs painted black, and barrels stacked to look like funnels, out of which poured smoke produced by smudge pots to mimic the smoke produced by a steam engine.

12 Military Deceptions that Changed the Course of History Forever
Wooden dummy ironclad used to hoax the Confederates into destroying their recently-captured Indianola. Wikimedia

The dummy warship was then floated past Vicksburg, and when word that a powerful “ironclad” was headed their way reached the Confederate salvage crews working to repair and refloat the recently captured Indianola, they panicked, and in order to prevent the Indianola’s recapture, the Confederates set fire to the ship’s magazine and blew her up.

12 Military Deceptions that Changed the Course of History Forever
Murat stopping an Austrian sergeant from setting charges to destroy Tabor Bridge. Maquetland

Murat’s Seizure of a Danube Bridge

After Napoleon captured an Austrian army at Ulm in 1805, the Austrians’ Russian allies retreated across the Danube, hoping to buy time to regroup by interposing the river between themselves and the French. To keep Napoleon from crossing, all bridges over the Danube were destroyed, or rigged with explosives for destruction to keep them out of French hands.

Meanwhile, as the French approached Vienna on the Danube, peace negotiations were underway. Because it might prove unnecessary if the negotiations bore fruit, the Austrians refrained from blowing up Vienna’s bridges, but prepared them with explosives for destruction if the French tried to capture them. One of them was the Tabor Bridge, guarded by an officer named Auesberg.

On November 13th, advance French units, commanded by Joachim Murat and Jean Lannes, reached the bridge and stacked arms. Murat and Lannes then casually strolled across the bridge, conversing, laughing, and talking about the “just signed” armistice and peace treaty, while confused Austrian soldiers covered them with their muskets. Upon reaching the other side, they asked to see Auesberg, wondering if he had gone to witness the treaty signing.

While a message was sent to summon Auesberg, Murat and Lannes kept talking with the Austrian soldiers to distract them from French grenadiers now casually crossing the bridge. When Auesberg arrived, he believed the French officers, and when one of his sergeants voiced his suspicions, Murat berated Auesberg for allowing an enlisted man to mouth off, offend officers, and jeopardize the armistice.

The hapless Auesberg was shamed into arresting the sergeant, then turned control of the bridge over to the French. They promptly crossed the Danube, and within a month, destroyed the Austro-Russian armies at Austerlitz, the most brilliant of Napoleon’s victories. The unfortunate Auesberg was tried for dereliction of duty, convicted, and executed.

12 Military Deceptions that Changed the Course of History Forever
Stranding and capture of the USS Philadelphia. Ibiblio

Destruction of the USS Philadelphia

The First Barbary War (1801 – 1805), was fought between the United States and the Barbary states of Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, and Tripoli, over the Barbary states’ predation on American merchant shipping, and America’s refusal to pay tribute to halt the attacks. A US Navy squadron sailed into the Mediterranean to confront the Barbary pirates and to protect American shipping.

The squadron included the USS Philadelphia, a 1240 ton sailing frigate with 36 guns, which was quite powerful for its day. On October 31st, 1803, while chasing a pirate ship, the Philadelphia ran aground on an uncharted reef two miles from Tripoli’s harbor. All attempts to refloat her failed, so her captain ordered her bottom holed, guns thrown overboard, and gunpowder spoiled before surrendering the ship and crew.

Notwithstanding her captain’s efforts, the Tripolitanians did manage to refloat the Philadelphia, and towed her into their harbor for salvage and restoration. The ship was too powerful a prize to allow to remain in the pirates’ hands, so the US Navy decided to recapture or destroy it, and the mission to do one or the other was assigned to Lieutenant Stephen Decatur.

Earlier, the US Navy had captured a Tripolitanian ketch and renamed her the Intrepid. It was restored to its original condition to look like a local ship, and on the night of February 16th, 1804, disguised as a Maltese ship flying a British flag, Decatur and a contingent of volunteers sailed her into Tripoli harbor. They feigned distress, claiming to have lost all anchors in a storm, and the pilot asked and was granted permission to tie up next to the Philadelphia.

Once tied up to the captured frigate, Decatur and his men overwhelmed her guards, using only cold steel without firing a shot so as not to alert the authorities. Upon confirming that the ship was repairable and seaworthy, but unable to sail her away themselves, Decatur and his men destroyed the Philadelphia by putting her to the torch, then made their escape.

12 Military Deceptions that Changed the Course of History Forever
Mongol generals Subutai and Jebe relaxing in the aftermath of their victory, as the captive Mstislav III is brought before them. Our Russia

Battle of the Kalka River

The Battle of Kalka River on May 31st, 1223, occurred at the tail end of one of history’s longest feigned retreats, in which a Mongol army led by two of Genghis Khan’s chief lieutenants, Subutai and Jebe, lured a much larger force of Russians and Cumans into chasing them across the Steppe for hundreds of miles, before the Mongols turned around and annihilated their pursuers.

Following Genghis Khan’s conquest of the Khwarezmian Empire, Mongol generals Subutai and Jebe, who had chased the defeated empire’s ruler to his death in an island on the Caspian Sea, got permission from Genghis to conduct a reconnaissance in force westwards, and with their force of 20,000 Mongols, raid into Iran, then northwards into the Caucasus, before returning to Mongolia via the Steppe north of the Caspian Sea.

En route, the duo met and defeated the nomadic Cumans, whose khan fled to the Kievan Rus and convinced them to help fight the Mongols. The Rus and surviving Cumans assembled an army of 80,000 men under the joint command of Mstislav III of Kiev, and Mstislav the Bold of Galich. They caught up with and defeated the Mongol rearguard, at which point Jebe and Subutai decided to lure their pursuers into an ambush.

Pretending to panic after their rearguard’s defeat, the Mongols conducted a feigned retreat, and the led their pursuers on a merry chase which lasted for nine days, during which their pursuers lost their cohesion and became strung out in a long column. Finally, on the 9th day, Subutai and Jebe set up an ambush, crossing the Kalka River and concealing their forces near the opposite bank.

When the pursuers began crossing the river, the Mongols waited until most had reached their side, before springing their ambush and charging suddenly out of their concealed positions to shower the Russians with a rain of arrows before closing in. The ferocious and sudden attack from an enemy whom they had thought was in panicked flight shocked the Russians and threw them into confusion, which swiftly turned into a rout.

The Mongols encircled their panicked opponents and butchered them, killing around 75,000 out of the 80,000 who had set out to pursue them. Of the defeated commanders, Mstislav the Bold escaped, while Mstislav of Kiev managed to reach a fortified camp on the Dnieper, where the Mongols surrounded him. He eventually surrendered in exchange for a promise of safe conduct back to his territory, but the Mongols reneged, slaughtered his men, and executed him.

12 Military Deceptions that Changed the Course of History Forever
Battle of Cannae. Dickinson College


Carthaginian general, Hannibal Barca led an army into Italy during the Second Punic War (218 – 201 BC), with which he won a series of stunning victories against the Romans. The lopsided losses humiliated Rome and shook her hold on the Italy, as allies abandoned their allegiance and either joined Hannibal, or declared neutrality. The Romans appointed a shrewd general, Quintus Fabius Maximus, dictator for 6 months, and he adopted a delaying strategy against the dangerous Carthaginian that became known as “Fabian”. Realizing that Rome’s manpower resources exceeded Hannibal’s, Fabius turned to attrition, whittling the Carthaginian’s forces with skirmishes and raids on his supply lines, while avoiding pitched battle.

That stabilized the situation, but did not sit well with Fabius’ fellow citizens, who wanted to avenge the earlier defeats as soon as possible. When Fabius’ term expired, the Romans amassed 87,000 men, their largest army to date, and marched off to crush Hannibal. Hannibal, who had been frustrated by Fabius’ attrition tactics, was willing to accommodate the Romans and let them try. At Cannae, on August 2nd, 216 BC, he offered the Romans battle, pitting his army of 40,000 men against the Romans’ 87,000.

Hannibal adopted a tactical deception plan that was carried out to perfection. He placed his less disciplined Gauls in the center, in a formation that bulged out towards the Romans, and on either side of the Gauls, he positioned his disciplined African infantry (see map above). As the Romans advanced, the Gauls would give way, until their formation which had started off bulging outwards, bent and bulged inwards, forming a bowl shape or sack. Hannibal reasoned that the Romans, emboldened by their enemy giving ground and scenting victory, would rush into the sack.

Once inside the sack, the African infantry positioned to the Gauls’ sides would wheel inwards and attack the Roman flanks. By then, the Carthaginian cavalry should have defeated the Roman cavalry. It would then turn around, and attack the enemy infantry’s rear, thus completely encircling the Romans. All went as Hannibal had planned, and in a battle viewed to this day as the gold standard for tactical generalship, the Romans were surrounded and nearly wiped out, with only 10,000 out of the 87,000 strong army escaping, while the rest were either slaughtered or captured.

12 Military Deceptions that Changed the Course of History Forever
Battle of Lake Trasimene. Emerson Kent

Lake Trasimene

On June 24th, 217 BC, after goading the commander of a Roman army into a rash pursuit, Carthaginian general Hannibal Barca, using deception and guile, lured them into a trap along the northern shore of Lake Trasimene. There, he sprang on his unsuspecting pursuers what is considered, in terms of the number of combatants involved, history’s largest tactical military ambush.

After Hannibal defeated two Roman armies in northern Italy in 218 BC, Rome’s consuls for 217 BC were sent at the head of two armies to deal with him. One of the consuls, Gaius Flaminius, gathered the survivors of the earlier defeats, and reinforced by new recruits, formed them into an army of about 30,000 men and marched south to defend Rome. Hannibal followed him, and marching faster, overtook and passed Flaminius, and got his own army between that of the Romans and their home city.

It was one of history’s earliest examples of a successful strategic turning movement, getting between a defender and his base. Taking advantage of that, and to draw out Flaminius and goad him into giving battle, Hannibal began devastating and burning the countryside as he marched south. Flaminius was compelled to hurry his army to catch up with Hannibal before the Carthaginian reached Rome.

As Hannibal continued his march southward, with Flaminius in hot pursuit, the Carthaginian came upon a suitable spot for an ambush at Lake Trasimene, about 80 miles north of Rome. There, a stretch of the road passed through a defile, hemmed in between the lake’s northern shore and forested hills. Hannibal set up his camp on the eastern end of the defile, so as to be within clear of sight of Flaminius when he got there.

Hannibal formed his heavy infantry in front of the camp facing the road down which the Romans would arrive, to challenge them into battle. On the forested hills skirting the road to the north, he concealed his cavalry, light infantry, and Gaulish allies, and waited. When Flaminius arrived at the defile’s entrance on the morning of June 24th and saw the Carthaginian camp with forces arrayed in front of it to offer battle, he was relieved to have finally caught up with his quarry, and unwilling to chance Hannibal’s slipping away again, immediately marched in to get at the Carthaginians.

In his eagerness, Flaminius did not scout the hills to the north of the road before marching his army into the defile, and the hidden Carthaginians’ concealment was further helped by a fortuitous fog that morning, which reduced visibility. Once the last Roman entered the defile, trumpets were blown and the trap was sprung, as the concealed forces rushed down from the hills to fall on the flank and rear of the Romans, who suddenly found themselves surrounded on east, north, and west by the enemy, while the lake blocked them to the south. Flaminius’ army was wiped out, and out of the 30,000 men he took into battle that day, about half were killed or drowned, while the other half were taken prisoner.

12 Military Deceptions that Changed the Course of History Forever
Macedonian phalanx attacking the Indian center in the Battle of the Hydaspes River, by Andre Castaigne, 1899. Wikimedia

Hydaspes River

At the Battle of the Hydaspes River in May of 326, BC, fought in what is now the Punjab between Alexander the Great of Macedon and the Indian king Porus, Alexander successfully carried out a brilliant military deception that wrong footed his opponent and caught him off guard, and set the stage for a complete Macedonian victory.

When Alexander marched into the Punjab, king Porus set out to intercept the invaders, and beating them to the Hydaspes river, which Alexander would have to cross to penetrate into Porus’ territory, the Indian king waited on the far bank with his army to prevent Alexander from crossing. When the Macedonians arrived, Porus set his camp across the river from Alexander, and shadowed the Macedonian’s movements from the opposite side, as the invader marched up and down the far bank in search of a safe crossing.

So long as Porus shadowed the Macedonians from the opposite bank, a crossing of the deep and fast-moving river could prove catastrophic if made against opposition, as the Indians would be able to strike the Macedonians at their most vulnerable mid-stream, or fall upon and overwhelm a portion of Alexander’s on the Indian side of the river, before the crossing was completed.

So Alexander set out to lull Porus by marching his troops up and down his side of the river each day. The Indians vigilantly shadowed those movements at first, but over time, became accustomed to them and grew complacent. Then Alexander quietly drew off the bulk of his army, leaving behind a contingent to make noisy demonstrations in order to keep the Indians fixated on them, while Alexander hurried to a crossing upriver and safely got his force across, unopposed. Once on Porus’ side of the Hydaspes, Alexander advanced to attack, and caught the Indians in a pincer between the main force under his command, and the smaller contingent left behind on the opposite side of the river to keep Porus occupied, which crossed the Hydaspes and fell upon the Indians’ rear and flank when they turned to face Alexander. The battle was hard fought, but the outcome was a total Macedonian victory.

12 Military Deceptions that Changed the Course of History Forever
Alexander the Great faking the Persian cavalry out of position at the Battle of Gaugamela. Quora


At the Battle of Gaugamela, October 1st, 331 BC, Alexander the Great’s army was outnumbered by that of the Persian king, Darius, who positioned himself at the center of his lines, with cavalry to either side, and chariots in front (see map above). Alexander beat him by pulling off one of history’s most successful battlefield tactical deceptions.

Alexander rode off with most of his cavalry, including his elite Companion Cavalry, towards the right of the field, accompanied by a scratch force of infantry, whom he interposed between his cavalry on that side of the field and the Persian chariots, to keep the chariots from striking the Macedonian cavalry’s exposed flank as he rode towards the right of the field. The Persian cavalry opposite Alexander shadowed him, riding parallel toward the right side of the map, to ensure he did not outflank the Persian line. That was what Alexander wanted: to remove as much of the Persian cavalry from their initial position as possible.

Alexander had a surprise for the Persian cavalry: while riding off toward the right, he had some light infantry keeping pace with him, but concealed from Persian sight by Alexander’s cavalry between the Persians and Alexander’s light infantry. The result was three parallel lines moving towards the right side of the map: the Persian cavalry, Alexander’s cavalry, whom the Persians could see, and Alexander’s light infantry, whom the Persians could not see and of whose existence they were unaware.

The Persian cavalry, shadowing Alexander as he moved to the right, eventually got ahead of him and outflanked what they assumed had been Alexander’s attempt to outflank them. Then, having gained the “advantage”, the Persian cavalry charged Alexander. That was precisely what Alexander had hoped they would do: in shadowing him and keeping pace as he rode to the right of the field, a gap had opened in the Persian line. A gap where the Persian cavalry had been at the start of the battle, and Alexander’s goal all along had been to draw the Persian cavalry out of position in order to produce that very gap (see map below).

12 Military Deceptions that Changed the Course of History Forever
Alexander the Great’s change of direction and charge at Persian king Darius III’s position. Quora

That was when Alexander’s concealed light infantry came into play: when the Persian cavalry charged, Alexander released the hitherto concealed light infantry to engage the Persian cavalry, and left them, along with most of his cavalry, to keep the Persian cavalry busy. Then, he neatly disengaged his elite Companion Cavalry from the fray, and turning direction, rode back at their head in a wedge formation, straight for the gap in the Persian line where the Persian cavalry had been at the start of the battle.

A gap where the Persian king, Darius, happened to be. It was a surgical strike that won the day. Seeing Alexander leading a furious cavalry charge straight at him, without enough cavalry of his own in position to ward him off, Darius panicked and fled the battlefield. The Gaugamela battle scene in the movie Alexander faithfully depicted this maneuver as it was described by contemporary writers in Alexander’s day.