Politics

When Strategy Trumped Morals: America’s Most Controversial Allies

Darren - July 3, 2025

Throughout its history, the United States has often faced a dilemma: Should it uphold its stated values, or prioritize strategic advantage? In numerous instances, America has chosen to partner with questionable regimes and leaders—decisions justified by the promise of security, influence, or geopolitical leverage. These controversial alliances have ignited passionate debates, both at home and abroad, about whether the ends truly justify the means. This article delves into some of the most infamous partnerships, exploring what drove these choices and the complex legacies they left behind.

NEXT >>

1. Saudi Arabia: Oil and Convenience

America’s alliance with Saudi Arabia is a prime example of strategy eclipsing values. Despite the kingdom’s notorious human rights abuses, its immense oil reserves and pivotal role in Middle Eastern politics have made it an indispensable partner. Tensions reached a peak after the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, drawing global condemnation and renewed calls to rethink the relationship. Still, the economic and strategic incentives continue to prevail, illustrating how convenience often outweighs ethical concerns when national interests are at stake.

<< Previous

NEXT >>

2. Augusto Pinochet: The Chilean Dictator

In 1973, the U.S. backed General Augusto Pinochet following his violent coup against Chile’s elected government. Pinochet’s regime quickly became synonymous with brutal repression and widespread human rights violations. Yet, for Washington, the priority was halting the spread of communism in Latin America during the Cold War. This support, detailed by The Guardian, underscored a willingness to overlook authoritarianism when it served a larger strategic aim—forever shaping U.S.-Latin American relations and Chile’s own trajectory.

<< Previous

NEXT >>

3. The Mujahideen: Allies in Afghanistan

In the 1980s, the U.S. made a strategic gamble by arming and training the Mujahideen during the Soviet-Afghan War. This support—aimed at undermining Soviet power—ultimately helped drive the Soviets out of Afghanistan. However, the policy had far-reaching repercussions, as many Mujahideen factions later evolved into extremist groups, including the Taliban. According to the History Channel, this controversial alliance stands as a classic case of short-term strategy producing long-term instability—a lesson in the unintended costs of proxy warfare.

<< Previous

NEXT >>

4. Saddam Hussein: Enemy Turned Partner

During the Iran-Iraq War of the 1980s, the U.S. found itself supporting Saddam Hussein despite his regime’s notorious brutality. The partnership was rooted in a desire to curb Iranian power in the region, leading to intelligence sharing and indirect military aid. However, as detailed by NPR, this calculated alliance would later haunt U.S. policymakers. Saddam’s later defiance and aggression transformed him from a strategic partner into one of America’s most infamous adversaries.

<< Previous

NEXT >>

5. Ngo Dinh Diem: The South Vietnamese Strongman

The U.S. backed Ngo Dinh Diem as the leader of South Vietnam, viewing him as a critical barrier to communist expansion in Southeast Asia. However, Diem’s authoritarian rule and harsh repression of dissent only deepened instability and alienated the local population. According to the U.S. Department of State, this alliance ultimately undercut American objectives, setting the stage for deeper involvement in a conflict that would prove both costly and divisive.

<< Previous

NEXT >>

6. Ferdinand Marcos: The Philippine Autocrat

For years, the U.S. maintained close ties with Ferdinand Marcos, even as his regime imposed martial law and was mired in corruption. The Philippines’ strategic position in the Pacific made Marcos a valuable ally during the Cold War. American support continued despite mounting evidence of human rights abuses and democratic backsliding. This enduring partnership highlighted how military priorities and regional influence often took precedence over calls for accountability and reform.

<< Previous

NEXT >>

7. Mobutu Sese Seko: King of Zaire

For more than three decades, Mobutu Sese Seko ruled Zaire with an iron fist, enriching himself as the nation languished in poverty. Driven by Cold War competition, the U.S. provided Mobutu with significant aid and political backing, valuing him as a steadfast anti-communist force in central Africa. As reported by the Washington Post, this alliance persisted despite glaring corruption and oppression, exposing the costs of prioritizing ideological loyalty over democratic ideals.

<< Previous

NEXT >>

8. Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi: Iran’s Last Monarch

For decades, the U.S. stood firmly behind Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, drawn by his pro-Western orientation and Iran’s strategic oil reserves. American involvement included supporting the CIA-backed 1953 coup that solidified the Shah’s power. While the alliance brought short-term stability, the Shah’s repressive rule sowed deep resentment among Iranians. As noted by Britannica, this partnership laid the groundwork for the 1979 revolution and decades of distrust between the U.S. and Iran.

<< Previous

NEXT >>

9. Manuel Noriega: Panama’s Strongman

For years, the U.S. maintained a complicated relationship with Manuel Noriega, leveraging his intelligence services in exchange for continued support. Despite Noriega’s reputation for authoritarianism and his deep entanglement in drug trafficking, American interests in the region prevailed. Ultimately, the partnership unraveled, culminating in the U.S. invasion of Panama and Noriega’s removal in 1989. As CNN reports, this alliance underscores the risks of overlooking criminality for perceived strategic gain.

<< Previous

NEXT >>

10. The Contras: Rebels in Nicaragua

In the 1980s, the U.S. secretly supported the Contras, a rebel group fighting Nicaragua’s leftist Sandinista government. Despite widespread reports of atrocities committed by the Contras, American backing continued as part of a broader anti-communist effort in Central America. The History Channel details how this controversial alliance became a defining episode of Cold War realpolitik—one where strategic imperatives repeatedly overshadowed human rights concerns.

<< Previous

NEXT >>

11. Syngman Rhee: South Korea’s First President

The U.S. lent crucial backing to Syngman Rhee, South Korea’s first president, especially during the Korean War. Though Rhee’s government was marked by authoritarianism and the suppression of dissent, he was regarded as a bulwark against communist expansion in East Asia. According to Britannica, American support persisted despite widespread abuses, highlighting the recurring willingness to compromise on democratic ideals when strategic interests demanded it.

<< Previous

NEXT >>

12. Hosni Mubarak: Egypt’s Longtime Ruler

For almost three decades, the U.S. supported Hosni Mubarak, viewing him as a cornerstone of stability in the volatile Middle East. Mubarak’s regime was notorious for widespread human rights violations and political repression, yet American aid continued to flow. According to the BBC, this support was largely driven by Egypt’s peace treaty with Israel and its pivotal regional role—once again demonstrating how strategic needs often outweighed moral considerations in U.S. foreign policy.

<< Previous

NEXT >>

13. Anastasio Somoza: Nicaragua’s Dynasty

For decades, the U.S. supported the Somoza family as they ruled Nicaragua with an iron grip, notorious for oppression and rampant corruption. Despite the regime’s brutality, American backing was sustained by strategic and economic interests in Central America. As noted by NPR, this alliance exemplified a recurring pattern: U.S. priorities in the region frequently overshadowed calls for democracy and human rights, with lasting consequences for Nicaraguan society.

<< Previous

NEXT >>

14. The Greek Military Junta

Between 1967 and 1974, the U.S. tolerated and, at times, supported Greece’s military junta, overlooking its harsh repression of dissent. The regime’s disregard for civil liberties directly contradicted American democratic principles. However, as Foreign Policy explains, maintaining NATO unity during the Cold War overshadowed concerns about democracy. This period remains a powerful example of how alliances can lead America to compromise its stated values for the sake of strategic stability.

<< Previous

NEXT >>

15. Francois Duvalier: Haiti’s ‘Papa Doc’

The U.S. largely turned a blind eye to the violence and corruption of Francois ‘Papa Doc’ Duvalier’s regime in Haiti, prioritizing anti-communist loyalty over human rights concerns. As long as Duvalier opposed Soviet influence, his brutal tactics were tolerated, reflecting a pattern seen throughout U.S. foreign policy during the Cold War. The New York Times notes that such alliances left deep scars on nations and their people.

<< Previous